The letter S in a light blue, stylized speech bubble followed by SpeakBits
SpeakBitsThe letter S in a light blue, stylized speech bubble followed by SpeakBits
Trending
Top
New
Controversial
Search
Groups

Enjoying SpeakBits?

Support the development of it by donating to Patreon or Ko-Fi.
About
Rules
Terms
Privacy
EULA
Cookies
Blog
Have feedback? We'd love to hear it!

What is the right data deletion policy for SpeakBits?

submitted
a year ago*
byspeakbitstospeakbitsmeta

There are two possibilities for how to handle how are user deletes the data from their account:

  1. When a user deletes their account, all user references and connections are removed from the post/comment but the content remains up. If the content contains any personally identifiable information (PII), moderators and admins can be contacted to take that information down.
  2. When a user deletes their account, all content, pictures, and user connections are completely deleted and the post/comment cannot be restored in any way.

As people are finding, #1 is somewhat what Reddit does as they find previously deleted posts are having their content re-added with their user info scrubbed. From some other comments I have read, this is in compliance with the GDPR as all of the PII is removed from the rest of the content.

SpeakBits has been implemented with #2. The issue with #2 is that content that users would still find useful and relevant is now gone because a user deleted their account even though there is nothing about the contentthat is about the user that posted it.

I'm wondering what people think is the right approach?

8

6 Comments

3
pabloskruen
a year ago
I would say that's its good to atleast keep the posts n images for a fews around 90 till the user creates a new account. After those 90days all the posts must be removed.
3
speakbitsOPAdmin
a year ago
I believe this would be kind of what facebook does where it is a soft delete and you have time to return to your account. I think this could be cool to provide as an option for users when deleting their account.
0
deleted
a mo ago
This comment has been removed.
3
skylestia
a year ago

I think the second option is better of these two. I think people should have the control over their content as they see fit. I think the way Reddit does it is pretty gross. That's just my opinion but I think, based on conversations I've read there, that many people on r/RedditAlternatives would likely agree with me. Whether or not we're a minority in the broader social media population when it comes to this, I have no idea.

The continued existence of user made content should come down to the discretion of the user who created it imho

3
joseph
a year ago

The continued existence of user made content should come down to the discretion of the user who created it imho

This is such a good point! I know the argument against is that everyone who comes upon the discussion later loses all context since some of it will be deleted but you are absolutely right, the user chose to put it up and it should be up to the user if it stays up.

2
skylestia
a year ago

Yeah absolutely, I know firsthand it can be frustrating when the answer to a question has been deleted, but I also know in my experience that generally those answers can still be found somewhere else. Or the person searching for the answer can just ask in a new post.

Sorry if being repetitive but to rephrase: imo the person who creates/posts something should be considered to "own" that creation/post and be able to remove it if they want to. In the same way I'd argue people should be able to destroy their own physical property if they want to.